Does HFNC really make sense in COVID

Many doctors I came had this reasoning that HFNC reduces anatomical dead space and they believed this make a therapeutic difference. They had picked up this belief from literature which I traced to a single paper.

In case of cost of therapy it boils down on whether to use 60LPM of oxygen through a cannula or an average 15LPM through a mask. The correct answer saves on oxygen utilisation.

Let us go into a simple estimate

  1. Tidal volume : 1000ml
  2. Anatomical dead space (Residual lung volume + airway volume) 500ml
  3. Nasopharynx: 150ml
  4. Anatomical dead space saving by HFNC: 150/500 = 30%
  5. At 100% FiO2 that works out to:
    1. Decrease in alveolar CO2 concentration from 5% to 3.5%
    1. Increase in oxygen concentration from 95% to 96.5%

I.e 40% decrease in CO2 and 1% improvement in Oxygen concentration

Is 60LPM worth this 1% improvement in Oxygen? Does this Anatomical dead space reduction really make sense in Type 1 respiratory failure of COVID?

Clinically we have got feedback that NIV R20 maintains SpO2 efficiently. But a scientific paper is yet to be published. If so this would be a sort of myth buster.

If Anatomical dead space reduction (or residual capacity improvement) does not make sense that what makes sense in HFNC? Well, prevention of entrainment of room air is the one and only mechanism that makes HFNC work. If so there should be other ingenious ways of preventing room air entrainment without wasting oxygen. NIV R20 is one such innovation.

4 thoughts on “Does HFNC really make sense in COVID”

  1. XEvil – the best captcha solver tool with unlimited number of solutions, without thread number limits and highest precision!
    XEvil 5.0 support more than 12.000 types of image-captcha, included ReCaptcha, Google captcha, Yandex captcha, Microsoft captcha, Steam captcha, SolveMedia, ReCaptcha-2 and (YES!!!) ReCaptcha-3 too.

    1.) Flexibly: you can adjust logic for unstandard captchas
    2.) Easy: just start XEvil, press 1 button – and it’s will automatically accept captchas from your application or script
    3.) Fast: 0,01 seconds for simple captchas, about 20..40 seconds for ReCaptcha-2, and about 5…8 seconds for ReCaptcha-3

    You can use XEvil with any SEO/SMM software, any parser of password-checker, any analytics application, or any custom script:
    XEvil support most of well-known anti-captcha services API:, RuCaptcha, (Anti-Captcha), DeathByCaptcha, etc.

    Interested? Just search in Google “XEvil” for more info
    You read this – then it works! ;)))


  2. Another controversial opinion by R. Hope some enterprising PG picks up this reasoning and publish some nice paper to leap frog his career.

Leave a Reply to Ramu Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.